Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 22, 2025, 3:03 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My case against Creationism and Infinite regression
#43
RE: My case against Creationism and Infinite regression
(April 25, 2016 at 9:50 am)Irrational Wrote:
(April 25, 2016 at 9:47 am)Drich Wrote: Here's your problem, The same argument can be made of 'science.' Instead of having God to fill the gaps you crutch in science to fill the same gaps. I know on the surface science can be used to explain the discernible, but when it comes to things out of our reach (say origins/big bang) you are in no better shape than a creationist who says "God did it." Why? because you still have an un-caused, cause. In the case of the believer God speaks the universe into existence. where science is god, you have a "basket ball" explode and everything that is comes from said basket ball. If as you say their isn't an infinite regression then your left with the answer "science says so" when someone asks what caused the big bang.

So then how is that position any more tenable than "God did it?"

Science will always be a better method for knowledge in any field than just postulating some entity we have no empirical evidence for.

Again you guys don't seem to understand that 'empirical evidence' can be manuplited to say anything the man funding the 'science' wants it to say.

In the 1940s 9 doctors out of 10 said smoking is healthy.
In the 1930s German Scientists discovered that the Aryans were pinicale of human evolution/The master race.
In the 1960s dumping toxic waste in the ocean was said to have no negitive effect.
In the 1970s Their was going to be a minnie Ice age by 2000 (global cooling)
In the 1980 Their was a hole in the Ozone that would never close (till we taxed comsumers enough and it did)
Then in the late 1990s Global warming started.
Then by 2010 the phrase was changed to global climate change so whether it gets warmer or colder "science" and continue to claim the sky is falling and tax consumers till we have nothing left to tax.

Your god "science" is a whore that follows who or whatever has the most money, and will say anything for 'more funding.'

So if be 'better method of knowledge' you mean a conduit for propaganda and social control, then yes I agree.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: My case against Creationism and Infinite regression - by Drich - April 25, 2016 at 11:57 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is the Afro-Asiatic linguistics incompatible with Young-Earth Creationism? FlatAssembler 17 2233 July 13, 2023 at 5:45 pm
Last Post: FlatAssembler
  Creationism and Ignorance vulcanlogician 273 59843 May 23, 2018 at 3:03 am
Last Post: Amarok
  Creationism out in Youngstown brewer 17 3247 September 25, 2016 at 7:48 am
Last Post: c172
  In Case You Need A Reason To Despise Baptist Scum-suckers Minimalist 93 12906 July 1, 2016 at 11:35 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  BBC's Conspiracy Road Trip: Creationism Cyberman 5 1722 March 12, 2016 at 8:45 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  Fundie Creationism song 2016 drfuzzy 17 4393 January 29, 2016 at 8:50 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Creationism lulz Longhorn 14 3348 June 15, 2015 at 2:56 pm
Last Post: Longhorn
  Jason Lisle: Creationism exists, but atheism doesn't Cyberman 51 13231 June 11, 2015 at 6:30 am
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 408609 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for an Insurrection Against Jesus Christ, Part II Whateverist 15 4093 December 11, 2014 at 5:05 pm
Last Post: abaris



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)