My case against Creationism and Infinite regression
April 26, 2016 at 9:20 am
(This post was last modified: April 26, 2016 at 9:20 am by LadyForCamus.)
(April 24, 2016 at 12:10 am)SteveII Wrote:(April 23, 2016 at 4:34 pm)IATIA Wrote: Why? The universe is simply a changed form of what it was 'before' the Big Bang'.
So, you don't think that the beginning of space-time and all physical reality (including physical laws) could be characterized as a new system? Please also explain how the laws of physics stop working at Planck time (before you get back to the singularity) and how the First Law of Thermodynamics mysteriously is exempt and will continue on not just to the singularity, but through to the other side.
In addition, please tell us what came 'before' the Big Bang that avoids the absurdity of a past infinite chain.
*buzzer* You are making the God claim. Burden of proof is on you, friend.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
