RE: Parents not taking there crying child outside at a restaurant or store
April 30, 2016 at 6:07 pm
(April 30, 2016 at 4:52 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(April 30, 2016 at 4:34 pm)Yeauxleaux Wrote: Tbh if you have kids and can't afford someone to hire a babysitter for them, I don't know exactly where you'd get the money from to be going some fancy expensive restaurant anyway. Priorities.
No shade, if I suddenly had a kid now, that would be me.
And of course there are more family-oriented restaurants which are more suitable for young families, nothing wrong with that. I just think people should know what they're getting before they go.
Um no, sorry. Of course there are different classes and different prices, and nobody should claim there shouldn't be differences. But it is absolute bullshit to claim that the middle class or even the working poor should not have a life outside of work, or should not have something comparable that the rich have.
No sorry, even the poor who have kids want alone time and want adult places to go to get a break. To say they should not have a life outside their work because of their pay scale is fucking bullshit.
"If you cant afford kids" is fucking classism. If the legality of having kids is class based then ban anyone making below a certain amount from having them, or remove their balls or uterus by force. If not, then the issue isn't pay scale, the issue is lack of livable wages.
Humans are not machines and should not be treated as objects, or numbers on a page for the rich to use like numbers on a spreadsheet.
What? If you can't afford kids, don't have them. That's not classism it's called being a responsible adult. I don't think people should be looked down on for bringing their kids to a restaurant or for not being able to afford a babysitter. But if you can't afford a babysitter you shouldn't be eating at a super fancy restaurant. No I don't mean Olive Garden that's not a fancy restaurant and there's no reason you can't bring your kids. But some places just aren't good for kids.
