(September 12, 2010 at 9:19 am)solja247 Wrote: The title of the thread is in fact a book, published in 1967. A small blue book 'refuting' evolution.
I began to read it and to my dismay, creationists arguements have not evolved at all! They are the same from 40 years ago! Should we expect any different? After all, they oppose evolution. If their arguements had evolved, they would be hypocrites! However, most creationists do believe in micro evolution and one can see they have micro evolved. From little blue books in the 60s to cool flash websites like Answers in Genesis...
Anyways, my point is, until, if ever, creationists have any convincing scientific arguements, all threads contending evolution should not be classified as science or in this part of the forum!
The Micro/Macro thing is a misnoma, there is no difference. It's one of those things like "kind" that have no scientific basis or working definition.
It's no surprise that their arguments are just as bad, evolution is just as much of a fact.
.
