(May 2, 2016 at 8:44 am)Wryetui Wrote: It is right because it is the original one and because it was developed from the apostolic fathers, that learned from the apostles.
Provide proof that it is the "original one". You simply stating so, doesn't make it true or right. All that exists are copies of copies of copies of translated manuscripts that were re-translated many times over. There is zero evidence of anything "original". This is yet another bs claim by a religitard.
Quote:However, the Bible is not a book. It is a collection of 80 writings of different epochs and persons.bold mine
In other words, a book. You now want to argue semantics over the usage of the word "book".
Quote:And it is a product of Sacred Tradition, that existed from the beginning of the revelation, only later it got written.
Again, you want to argue semantics because from where I sit, you weren't satisfied with the answers you got from the people that responded, so you do what every other theist on these forums does: word salad, shift your goal posts to better your argument and deny that people have actually answered you. Typical.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.