RE: Dr. Craig is a liar.
May 4, 2016 at 9:26 pm
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2016 at 9:27 pm by SteveII.)
(May 4, 2016 at 9:08 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(May 4, 2016 at 8:57 pm)SteveII Wrote: Did you actually listen to the interview??? This is a discussion on how free will interacts with God's knowledge and doctrinal distinctions. It is not proving what you think it does. Are you going to try again or do you just move on to another ridiculous assertion because that one didn't stick.
Yes, I did listen to them, all of them, in fact. Richard Swinburne does not believe that "god" knows the future (i.e., he/she/it is "omniscient").
Knowing the future and omniscience is not the same thing. From wikipedia
There is a distinction between:
inherent omniscience - the ability to know anything that one chooses to know and can be known.
total omniscience - actually knowing everything that can be known.
Some modern Christian theologians argue that God's omniscience is inherent rather than total, and that God chooses to limit his omniscience in order to preserve the freewill and dignity of his creatures.
Some do not believe in Free Will and would tend toward total omniscience. You are getting into doctrinal distinctions that are not proving your point, which was, if I can reword it succinctly, that natural theology was not a dependable source of knowledge of God.
