I have to give credit where it's due. At the very least, Steve seems genuinely interested in improving his apologetics game. Yeah, it's mostly by regurgitating WLC, but that's still an improvement from where he was last year. The progress he's made in his presentation puts him above some of the other theists on here who are either completely reprehensible or interested more in petty one-upmanship than anything else.
I mean, I don't find anything he's written to be convincing, but at least he seems to be trying to put some real thought into it. I consider that refreshing compared to what we usually get.
I mean, I don't find anything he's written to be convincing, but at least he seems to be trying to put some real thought into it. I consider that refreshing compared to what we usually get.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"