Dr. Craig is a liar.

[GUBU]

Because he's not even remotely touched by science or the acceptance thereoff. Otherwise he wouldn't be a creationist. He's a theologian. Well, that's OK, but I for one wouldn't dare enter a stage to refer on quantum physics or the iniverse, since my credentials don't cover these field. For the simple reason of not wanting to make a joke of myself. But that's what Craig does, on a regular basis. Refering and debating topics, he doesn't know shit about.

I'm just curious, do you think a person gets these articles published in secular philosophy and science journals by "not even remotely touched by science or the acceptance thereoff"?????? The list is too long, so just search for journal, science or philosophy. Have you seen the list of people whom he has debated? Do you think they waste their time with "jokes"? 

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/william-l...blications

As long as gullible people who are unwilling to learn,like you, exist, yes, people do have to debate with jokes (in the case of Craig sad, lying little shits of jokes at that. When a man says he knows better about what a theory contains and means than its three authors, despite showing a profound lack of knowledge of the suject matter at hand, he is a right piece of shit).