RE: Dr. Craig is a liar.
May 6, 2016 at 8:47 am
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2016 at 9:05 am by SteveII.)
(May 5, 2016 at 7:24 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote:DELETED. Changed my mind. I don't want to debate you.(May 5, 2016 at 7:03 am)SteveII Wrote: indetectible?
From natural theology:
KCA
Moral argument
Ontological Argument
Fine Tuning Argument
Argument from Contingency
OT Revelation
Miracles
Jesus
NT Revelation
Personal experiences of literally billions of Christians
Perhaps:
Life
Consciousness
A) your theological arguments are neither natural nor evidence. At best, they are special pleading. At worst they are lies.
B) The bible isn't evidence. If it were we'd have to accept that a Scottish giant destroyed a land bridge between Ulster and Galloway, because he was feared of Cuchulainn. This is, of course theGiant's Causeway myth, and it has the exact same evidential basis as the bible. On miracles name me one single one that has been shown to have happened and demonstrated to have no possible natural cause. Only then will I accept miracles as evidence.
C) Consciousness is an emergent property of human (and possibly other large brained species) brain functions. There is no wvidence to show that life neither needs nor has a supernatural explanation. As with miracles, bring evidence to the table and we'll talk. Until then I'll continue on the basis that you haven't the first iota of a clue about what you speak on.