(May 6, 2016 at 8:47 am)SteveII Wrote:(May 5, 2016 at 7:24 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote: A) your theological arguments are neither natural nor evidence. At best, they are special pleading. At worst they are lies.DELETED. Changed my mind. I don't want to debate you.
B) The bible isn't evidence. If it were we'd have to accept that a Scottish giant destroyed a land bridge between Ulster and Galloway, because he was feared of Cuchulainn. This is, of course theGiant's Causeway myth, and it has the exact same evidential basis as the bible. On miracles name me one single one that has been shown to have happened and demonstrated to have no possible natural cause. Only then will I accept miracles as evidence.
C) Consciousness is an emergent property of human (and possibly other large brained species) brain functions. There is no wvidence to show that life neither needs nor has a supernatural explanation. As with miracles, bring evidence to the table and we'll talk. Until then I'll continue on the basis that you haven't the first iota of a clue about what you speak on.
Clever boy, we both know I own the fuck out of you so far.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home