(April 28, 2016 at 10:06 am)pocaracas Wrote:(April 28, 2016 at 9:55 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote: She had been playing both sides so in the game she wasn't necessarily a "nice guy" to the other players. She was putting herself in a position to make a commitment to an alliance at the last second, which is a valid strategy, but also makes one untrustworthy to allies.True, true.... but also a person who the judges could see as playing a good game... maybe...
This is your first season, right? There's a lot of grudges that players take to the final tribal council. "Good gameplay" also has to consider the social aspect of the game. There have been times when the winner was the player who pissed off the least number of people - even at times when they rode coattails the whole time (Natalie won season 19 by virtue of the fact that she was not Russell Hantz, a strategically brilliant player who completely failed at playing the social aspect of the game).
