(May 9, 2016 at 11:08 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Okay, I'm gonna practice my (barely) rudimentary logic skills for a moment.
1) Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence.
I wouldn't reject premise one, because frankly under the formulation that Steve takes from WLC, this means that for god to exist he also needs a cause. It is the fundamental stumbling block to the argument, that there is no way for god to be given as causeless without independent evidence of his nature, and, well, if we had that, there'd be no need for the KCA because we'd have sufficient evidence to accept god's existence.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home