(May 10, 2016 at 8:19 am)Drich Wrote: Again read the OP. We are indeed talking about a man's age who lived 6000 years ago/4000 years older than your "wise men."
You are the one shifting the goal posts.
Also I noted you did not actually cite any "Sumerian god-king mythologies " wonder why? oh, that's right that's a copout argument sudo intellectuals use to try and dismiss something without actually having to quote anything of substance, nor draw parallels to properly refute it.
Nice try, but again if your going down that path you disqualify yourself from a honest discussion.
You mean these Sumerian god-kings? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumerian_King_List
I refer, of course, to the alignment with the First Dynasty of Kish, after the flood of Utnapishtim. And don't go trying to give me that apologist website crap about it "confirming" the Bible story that came after it; all your claims about Jewish lunar month-based timekeeping doesn't match and, as he been pointed out to you, would make half the guys on the list fathers at the age of five (actual) years old, and so on.
And FFS, dude, the word is "pseudo". If you're going to insult my intelligence by trying to sound like an intellectual, yourself, you should probably spell the insult in some way that indicates you have some idea of the actual meaning of the word you're trying to use as a pejorative, and aren't just phonetically copying the sounds you heard someone use as an insult, once.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.