Dr. Craig is a liar.

[SteveII]

-because it doesn't end in -therefore god exists-, which is the desired and advertised conclusion.  It is not an argument in support of or evidence -for a god-.  It's simply the preamble to a leap of faith.

You are right. It concludes an uncaused cause, timeless, immaterial, personal and powerful enough to create something from nothing. You use other arguments from natural theology to conclude other properties or characteristics.