(May 11, 2016 at 2:24 pm)SteveII Wrote:(May 11, 2016 at 10:47 am)Rhythm Wrote: -because it doesn't end in -therefore god exists-, which is the desired and advertised conclusion. It is not an argument in support of or evidence -for a god-. It's simply the preamble to a leap of faith.
You are right. It concludes an uncaused cause, timeless, immaterial, personal and powerful enough to create something from nothing. You use other arguments from natural theology to conclude other properties or characteristics.
How does it conclude, "personal" btw? And...what do you mean by "personal"?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.