(May 11, 2016 at 8:28 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(May 11, 2016 at 8:08 pm)SteveII Wrote: I see your point, but do you have another name for the characteristics inferred from the KCA?Are there any characteristics inferred from the kca, or are there merely characteristics claimed by the kca? Characteristics of what, anyway?
Quote:Would you prefer I called it the Uncaused Cause of the KCA? (UCKCA for short)Did you? You might want to reread what you wrote about that. You seem to be using the word reason in as novel a fashion as you use the word personal. I doubt my preferences are relevant, but I'd prefer to hear those reasons, rather than hear you claim to posess them, or claim to have attempted to communicate what you have not shown to exist in the first place. I don't believe that these reasons exist, and you've given me no reason to think otherwise. I'm -certain- that your beliefs exist...and I'm almost certain that you've somehow managed to confuse your beliefs with reason, or reasons. Such as your belief that gods mind must be ordered according to some principles...as a reason that logic is grounded in the mind of a god.
I tried to give reasons why I think logic is grounded in the mind of...the UCKCA.
If I remember correctly, you asked something about God creating constraints. If God "created" logic, he would not be bound by it. If God were not bound by logic he would be able to illogical things like pick up the rock and count to infinity...twice. Since, as I said before, illogical statements like married bachelor and round square aren't really "things" but are sets of contradictory terms, I don't think that logic was created. The more plausible foundation for logic is a reflection of the mind of God.