(May 11, 2016 at 9:20 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Strange...I don't see WLC using any actual scientific evidence (he only gives it a shout out) to support either his grand assertions about the natural laws of the universe, or his responses to scientifically grounded objections.
All I see here are simplistic, condescending, and childish metaphors that should insult the intelligence of any average, grown adult: "Well, why don't bicycles just pop into existence, then?" Really, WLC?
So you think there is scientific evidence against the first premise? If is simplistic, then it should be easy to list defeaters.