(May 11, 2016 at 9:37 pm)SteveII Wrote:(May 11, 2016 at 9:20 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Strange...I don't see WLC using any actual scientific evidence (he only gives it a shout out) to support either his grand assertions about the natural laws of the universe, or his responses to scientifically grounded objections.
All I see here are simplistic, condescending, and childish metaphors that should insult the intelligence of any average, grown adult: "Well, why don't bicycles just pop into existence, then?" Really, WLC?
So you think there is scientific evidence against the first premise? If is simplistic, then it should be easy to list defeaters.
We have a physicist in-house. Should we call him in as an expert witness you think? [emoji6]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
