The reason consecutive number seem less likely is that there are WAAAAY more combinations of non-consecutive numbers than consecutive ones. There are 49x48x47x46x45x44 different combinations of numbers ~ 10000000000
of which only 44 are sets of consecutive numbers (1,2,3,4,5,6......44,45,46,47,48,49)
EvF, you speak the truth, hold 'em is fun
of which only 44 are sets of consecutive numbers (1,2,3,4,5,6......44,45,46,47,48,49)
EvF, you speak the truth, hold 'em is fun
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
