(April 16, 2011 at 6:18 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Yes I understand that youngling. It sounds like circular logic to me:
I don't believe there's a God because there's no hard evidence, and there can be no hard evidence according to Xtianity.
how is that circular logic? there is no evidence whatsoever to prove god exists so believing in god must be irrational.
the opposite then must be true which is to NOT believe in god is far more rational. i didnt say it was correct, that is why i am agnostic as well as an atheist. i am saying that is what i think.
