(May 25, 2016 at 12:28 am)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:Eventually, the majority came back to the Army's boots.
Even the French needed multiple revolutions... and that after chopping off far more heads than ISIS. Most revolutions fail. Welcome to the club.
Can't argue with that..
"Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.Imam"
MNMP
The amount of support that Saudia put forth for regional dictators that would satisfy its interest was beyond measure; it was economical of course since they nothing to offer but money. But mainly, it was the UAE that had bigger problems with MB; in my personal opinion Saudi Arabia was only supporting "Sisi" despite the enemy he was facing; they would've supported him even if he faced another foe -aside from MB that is-.
I can't recall the name of the guy, but he spoke during this case:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3270071/Saudis-hand-350-lashes-frail-British-grandfather-making-wine-Family-appeal-David-Cameron-intervene-police-bottles-car.html
I do remember something like that, but cannot recall the name ><
I changed my views about Hamas to be honest, I can't really decide now if they are the best thing for the people of Ghaza. But Fatah are not even close to be "the good guys"; they are the other voice though of the other half of Palistine.
In my head, both parties suck, both parties are the main problem the Palistinian people cannot pass the line and liberate themselves. They are the best thing Israel can ever wish for.
I'm ignorant about voting systems to be honest (I never had to use one or even saw one ><). I guess it is the problem of nationalism that the majority of masses control everything, even if the opposing opinion differed so little. So unfair.
