RE: Well times up Hillary
June 12, 2016 at 3:59 am
(This post was last modified: June 12, 2016 at 4:13 am by ReptilianPeon.)
1. Election fraud is not just change.org petitions. Have you been living under a rock?
There are a number of different lawsuits. You have Election Justice USA in the states New York and Arizona for example. And you have Alliance for Democracy; in particular eection fraud experts Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis say they have proof that Hillary Clinton's campaign has benefited from election fraud. Loads of polling stations were closed (such as 2/3s in Rhode Island, Puerto Rico, Arizona, etc) and, as has already been mentioned, the exit polls.
Who are Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis? They've been tackling election fraud since 2004. So they know their stuff. I'll let the below video, posted June 9th, explain - where they talk about their lawsuit. In summary, Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis wanted the exit polls to be made public, which they said would prove election fraud. So, in response, New Jersey and California cancelled the exit pols. The video also mentioned that in 2012, these people probably saved Obama's reelection.
This Lawsuit Might End Hillary's Run & Prove Election Fraud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibK4de85IKw
Karl Rove was not told the election fraud was off in 2012 because the scrutiny was on in 2012, so that's why he went nuts:
2. Collin Powell did not own a private server. Hilary Clinton did. That's the difference. If Hilary is not charged with criminality then it sets dangerous precedent. She put the lives of CIA operative at risk, siphoned information so secretive the US government denies its very existence and nobody knows who exactly used her unauthorized and unsecured (for three whole months) sever.
The State Department report showed that all of Hilary's excuses were baloney. She lied about her e-mail sever. And she has also tried to stop the FBI from doing its job. She deleted over 30,000 e-mails which she deemed as "personal and private". That's another offense. I don't know why Hilary is so afraid of the Freedom of Information Act laws.
There are a number of different lawsuits. You have Election Justice USA in the states New York and Arizona for example. And you have Alliance for Democracy; in particular eection fraud experts Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis say they have proof that Hillary Clinton's campaign has benefited from election fraud. Loads of polling stations were closed (such as 2/3s in Rhode Island, Puerto Rico, Arizona, etc) and, as has already been mentioned, the exit polls.
Who are Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis? They've been tackling election fraud since 2004. So they know their stuff. I'll let the below video, posted June 9th, explain - where they talk about their lawsuit. In summary, Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis wanted the exit polls to be made public, which they said would prove election fraud. So, in response, New Jersey and California cancelled the exit pols. The video also mentioned that in 2012, these people probably saved Obama's reelection.
This Lawsuit Might End Hillary's Run & Prove Election Fraud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibK4de85IKw
Karl Rove was not told the election fraud was off in 2012 because the scrutiny was on in 2012, so that's why he went nuts:
2. Collin Powell did not own a private server. Hilary Clinton did. That's the difference. If Hilary is not charged with criminality then it sets dangerous precedent. She put the lives of CIA operative at risk, siphoned information so secretive the US government denies its very existence and nobody knows who exactly used her unauthorized and unsecured (for three whole months) sever.
The State Department report showed that all of Hilary's excuses were baloney. She lied about her e-mail sever. And she has also tried to stop the FBI from doing its job. She deleted over 30,000 e-mails which she deemed as "personal and private". That's another offense. I don't know why Hilary is so afraid of the Freedom of Information Act laws.
