RE: Human rights for mother nature?
April 24, 2011 at 7:30 am
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2011 at 7:35 am by ib.me.ub.)
(April 24, 2011 at 7:15 am)theVOID Wrote:(April 24, 2011 at 6:42 am)ib.me.ub Wrote:theVOID Wrote:Cattle emit massive levels of Methane, we know first hand here in New Zealand that Cattle producted Methane is responsible for as much as half of our greenhouse gas emissions, can we declare that a collection of Cows are thwarting the rights of other creatures and "mother earth" because of this?
You really don't know alot about environmental science do you.
It's not my strong point, but it is true that the dairy industry in New Zealand produces half of our greenhouse gas emissions and that these gasses are caused by cattle flatulence.
So, should the cattle be penalized for harming the environment?
No, we create the cattle.
theVOID Wrote:ib.me.ub Wrote:The opposite to a left.
And what does it mean to you to give mother nature "the opposite of a left"?
....the right to life and to exist; the right to pure water and clean air; the right to not have cellular structure modified or genetically altered; the right to have nature’s processes free from human alteration. [quote from Bolivian law extract].