RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 7:34 am
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2016 at 7:35 am by madog.)
(June 19, 2016 at 7:30 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote:(June 19, 2016 at 7:04 am)Stimbo Wrote: No, you didn’t say that - he did. I never claimed that which you ascribe to me, so your insinuating that I did is both arrogant and presumptuous. I also have no burden to prove your negative; that's your bag.
Do you think you can prove that I was saying you can prove what you were saying ? If so, burden of proof.
What may you think you saying "he did" in that above, proves ?
About you putting "no burden to prove your negative", do you think you can prove it wasn't me who was being accused ? If so, burden of proof.
You asked for burden of proof ... and I gave it ....
Quote:madog Wrote: ..................
[url=http://atheistforums.org/post-1307315.html#pid1307315][/url]I can prove free will is a woo phrase .....
Gospel according to Robvalue:
1:12 And so sayeth the Rob unto his value, Woo is the way of the saved and unto thee I grant thee free will to woo.
1:9 and thus the rob took of the rib of man and unto our value created Wooman and Wooman was good and mankind lived happily ever after.
Do you now agree? if not prove me wrong .... burden of proof ...
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
