(June 19, 2016 at 7:34 am)madog Wrote:(June 19, 2016 at 7:30 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Do you think you can prove that I was saying you can prove what you were saying ? If so, burden of proof.
What may you think you saying "he did" in that above, proves ?
About you putting "no burden to prove your negative", do you think you can prove it wasn't me who was being accused ? If so, burden of proof.
You asked for burden of proof ... and I gave it ....
Quote:madog Wrote: ..................
[url=http://atheistforums.org/post-1307315.html#pid1307315][/url]I can prove free will is a woo phrase .....
Gospel according to Robvalue:
1:12 And so sayeth the Rob unto his value, Woo is the way of the saved and unto thee I grant thee free will to woo.
1:9 and thus the rob took of the rib of man and unto our value created Wooman and Wooman was good and mankind lived happily ever after.
Do you now agree? if not prove me wrong .... burden of proof ...
You may think of the definition of the term free will - the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate, the ability to act at one's own discretion.
Do you think that doesn't disprove what you put above ?
