(June 21, 2016 at 1:31 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote:(June 21, 2016 at 2:25 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: Even from pure linguistic perspectives, the Quran is a masterpiece; you're not hearing this because I'm a biased Muslim; you would know it if you could speak Arabic indeed.
In terms of linguistic structure, the book is simple yet strong, poetic but accurate, ah well, Heathens of Mecca (who were masters of Arabic) couldn't breach into it; you'll hear this argument a lot as a proof for Islam, it's one of my favorites anyhow.
The Hadiths are dry, very dry in comparison.
By your token we must accept everything Shakespeare wrote as absolutely historically accurate in every detail, given how beautiful and poetic his use of English was.
The quality of language says nothing about the accuracy of a work's message, it only attests to how well a person can frame their thoughts.
You might not like it, I certainly don't, but the Saudi funded Fascists, have already attempted to address that contention. Clearly, my response is far more troublesome for the Da'is than simply stating "Shakespeare". The argument is Shakespeare can be replicated so the Quran is better because it can't (even though I showed it can).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38b0gRL5rzI
