Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 17, 2024, 9:58 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
Philosophy is not a very effective tool of discovery. From Plato on to Chalmers philosophers have asked "What is mind?". In the 21st century Chalmers ( like Descartes ) believes the mind enters the brain at the pineal gland. Mind-Body dualism is the pinnacle of thousands of years of intensive philosophical research. Not once in thousands of years did philosophers discover the role of the prefrontal cortex , hippocampus , neurotransmitters , or neurons . Craig thinks he has discovered the mind of God in his little word play but Philosophy is not science. Making a valid argument is not dependent on the truth of the premise.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked? - by chimp3 - June 22, 2016 at 6:00 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 77277 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid Foxaèr 26 6510 May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)