RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
June 22, 2016 at 7:11 am
(This post was last modified: June 22, 2016 at 7:12 am by chimp3.)
Premise 1 : It is possible that a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists.
Premise 2 : If it is possible that a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists, then it exists in some possible world.
Premise 3 : If a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists in some possible world then it exists in every possible world.
Premise 4 : If a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists in every possible world then it exists in the actual world.
Premise 5 : Therefore a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists in the actual world.
Premise 6 : Therefore a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists.
Conclusion : Therefore .... : )
Premise 2 : If it is possible that a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists, then it exists in some possible world.
Premise 3 : If a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists in some possible world then it exists in every possible world.
Premise 4 : If a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists in every possible world then it exists in the actual world.
Premise 5 : Therefore a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists in the actual world.
Premise 6 : Therefore a maximally great Cheshire Cat exists.
Conclusion : Therefore .... : )
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
