Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 17, 2024, 8:48 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
madog Offline
progeny of godpa and dogma
***
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 815
Threads: 4
Joined: June 2, 2016
Reputation: 12
#144
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
June 22, 2016 at 5:11 pm
(June 22, 2016 at 5:03 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Partly existent in the natural world is still fully existent overall.

Something cannot only partly exist in its entirety because any "part" that doesn't exist of that something specified isn't actually that something specified.

Accepted, just an attempt at a bad joke and an attempt for CW to explain something that doesn't most completely exist Smile
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?

Messages In This Thread
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked? - by madog - June 22, 2016 at 5:11 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 77276 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid Foxaèr 26 6510 May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)