Evidence that God exists

[athoughtfulman]

Frodo, the point you're missing is that you are not answering questions. You've already demonstrated your inability to answer questions in other threads, and this is no exception. So far, you've given us no reason to think otherwise.

But this debate about who's right is pointless. If we can get back to the topic (which I seriously doubt), we might have more success.

Frodo, you said: "I think there can be no empirical proof that the Christian God exists, and that this is a logical assertion given the above."

And Kyuu said: "you have to have a seriously warped sense of logic to interpret the complete absence of evidence as some kind of logical proof that there is a god."

So what the discussion was about is whether one needs evidence to believe in god or not, however correct me if I'm wrong. The point you are avoiding Frodo is answering the call to demonstrate why it is reasonable to have faith in a god for which there is no testable evidence of. If there were only one religion it would be easy, but you must also account for why your religion is worth believing in over any other claims which have not been backed with evidence, such as Islam, Hinduism and Judaism.