Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 2, 2025, 12:59 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
Mystic Offline
Banned
Religious Views: Shiite Muslim Twelver
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation: 44
#206
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
June 26, 2016 at 11:57 am
(June 26, 2016 at 4:27 am)Veritas_Vincit Wrote:
(June 24, 2016 at 6:00 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Actually God is everything at it's ultimate. Whatever is negative, you would take the negative qualities, turn them to positive, and he would be in someway the ultimate that thing. That's because everything get's it's existence and reality from God. God is what defines things nature, his own light and what they are with respect to that. That is why everything is a sign of God.

Why would you call that 'God' and not just 'the Universe'?

Because the universe is not each thing at it's utmost. It's rather limited and falls short of that.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?

Messages In This Thread
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked? - by MysticKnight - June 26, 2016 at 11:57 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 102947 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid Silver 26 8135 May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)