Christianity isn't anything to do with claims, substantiated or not. It just doesn't concern itself with discernible proof. It doesn't talk about it. It never addresses it. Science is, and that's great. I love science. Science is awesome. I need no superstitious overtone to that.. science stands alone unsupported. I love that.
You are saying that you won't consider belief in God because there is no discernible proof. I find that an impossible statement. I could say that I can't accept cheese exists because the word sky has 3 letters. To me that would be equally nonsensical.
You see where I'm going I hope. Does science ever address this logic? I'm not articulate enough to name what religious belief encapsulates in human experience completely. To what extent are science and religion non overlapping magesteria?
You are saying that you won't consider belief in God because there is no discernible proof. I find that an impossible statement. I could say that I can't accept cheese exists because the word sky has 3 letters. To me that would be equally nonsensical.
You see where I'm going I hope. Does science ever address this logic? I'm not articulate enough to name what religious belief encapsulates in human experience completely. To what extent are science and religion non overlapping magesteria?
