I feel a bit relieved.

[Angrboda]

4) Reincarnation, microvita and karma are all back up by the countless of people who had and NDE.

Now you're completely full of shit.  They provide no evidence for reincarnation, microvita, or karma.  Obviously you don't actually have any evidence for these things.  That's just sad.  Your whole worldview dependent on a mere interpretation of NDEs.  That's just sickening.

Obviously you haven't read much about NDEs experiences.
Read them and then come back here so your dogmas will leave space for a better outlook.

I've got a better idea.  Since it's your worldview and your evidence, why don't you link to just one NDE that provides evidence for microvita.  I predict you won't because you're just full of shit.  None of these things are evidenced by NDEs.  You're just full of hot air.

Ultimately, worldviews or hypotheses have to be judged not in some absurd 'winner takes all' contest of who can spin the most consistent and compelling tale, but on a comparison of how the evidence for each worldview or hypothesis stacks up in comparison to each other.  Such a judgement doesn't come from adversarial nay-saying, but from a holistic and charitable examination of the evidence for each.

The materialist paradigm is not without its gaps and flaws, but as a whole, the materialist worldview is well evidenced with entries coming from many fields, from philosophy to quantum mechanics.   What evidence have you proffered for your worldview?  Nothing but a bunch of analogies, bare assertions, a questionable interpretation of NDEs, your 'feelies' about your meditation and your intuitions about it, the yogic tradition, and various bits of tantric lore. If you've got something else to add to the pile, NOW is the time to introduce it.  But I've been listening to you a long time and I think it boils down to that.