Evidence that God exists

[Kyuuketsuki]

@ thoughtful: I have answered that question until I'm blue in the face. I don't know how I can say it any more clearly, I really don't. Are you unsure on my stance on that? Kyu want's evidence from me and I've said there can be no evidence. It can't exist, and that follows the logic.

And again this brings us right back to the question I asked in another thread, is it therefore valid to assume there is no god (in exactly the same way as we assume that the moon is not made of green cheese and that little green men in flying saucers are not constantly "buzzing " our Earth) until actual evidence is supplied?

Now if we were to explore the reasonoing then maybe we could get somewhere. But as Kyu refuses to start to go down that road, then my hands are tied and I'm unable to make a start with logical reasoning. Kyu simply refuses to consider anything outside his own personal safety net, I believe, because he knows he wouldn't last a second in the debate.

It's not that I refuse to explore the reasoning, I simply do not accept your logic ... that's entirely different thing. There is no safety net, there is what is and what is not ... you have yet to justify why we should give credence to claims within the "is not" realm as valid.

@ Kyu.. again you insult me personally, and fail to address the points. I don't care how you choose to label it. 'Hounding' to me is the same as flame baiting. Your reasoning re the liar thing is totally off the wall. It makes no sense at all. Stop engaging me because you think you have to. Just engage me if you have a point to make. Otherwise, for the sake of our sanity, please don't.

I say it the way I see it and it is my opinion that you are, whilst you continue to behave the way you do, a waste of space ... given your behaviour in this forum I think you would be hard pressed to find anyone who didn't at least empathise with what I said even if they have reservations with the way I said it.

Based on things you have said and your behaviour you are a demonstrably disingenuous, your major characteristic is one of avoidance and, let's be brutally honest here, saying you are disingenuous is really only a more fancy way of saying you're a "liar".

Flame baiting is provoking someone until you get an angry response. Hounding is to pursue relentlessly and tenaciously. They are not the same. My intent is purely and simply to get you to engage with the discussion and actually answer the questions asked so no, I am not flame baiting, I am hounding. Indeed, if you look at your recent behaviour with the pictures and so on it wouldn't be too hard to make a case for you being the one who is flame-baiting.

Kyu