(July 5, 2016 at 8:48 pm)Aractus Wrote: No I don't think so. I think this makes it more likely, because it now cements her position as the Democratic nominee. The FBI did not say that Clinton was innocent, they essentially said this: the skanky dishonest brothel-running bitch has been lying about her actions to the public for a year, she's as crooked as scoliosis and as guilty as Pistorius, but it is our view that the chances of a prosecution following an indictment are slim and therefore will not be recommending charges. If you don't think Trump can attack that you're dreaming.
No, I understand that Trump can attack this. I meant that it lessens the likelihood of a Trump presidency compared to if she had been indicted. Sure, Trump can use this against Hillary, but there's not quite as much fuel to the fire as if charges had been introduced.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
