No, it is not. You have to prove intent. Meaning you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she knew what she was doing was illegal. According to the FBI, there isn't evidence to prove that. Destroying evidence doesn't prove it because her lawyers did that and there is no evidence that she told them to. Signing a paper that said she wouldn't do it is also not evidence but I'm not actually sure why...
I think likely the FBI did their part right mostly at least and Clinton is maybe just really good at loopholes.
I think likely the FBI did their part right mostly at least and Clinton is maybe just really good at loopholes.
