Is There a Difference Between Trusting Scientists and Trusting Preachers?

[madog]

OK, are you saying you don't believe in a virgin birth? a man rising from the dead? to name just two religious beliefs ...

The reason I ask is by your statement a religious person that does believe in such things as above do not have "true religious beliefs" ...

It is not a scientific fact that there cannot be supernatural causes to natural events. Not even close. Science cannot even comment on it.

Are you being serious?  Are you saying science can't scientifically prove that birth, at our present evolutionary stage, can't produce the birth of a human child without sperm? or that a man dead for three days can't rise and come alive?

Science has more authority to talk about science than religion has to talk about science ... in fact the Bible doesn't try to talk about science it just relays myths, its the followers of the myths that think they can say more than the fiction book actually claims