Is There a Difference Between Trusting Scientists and Trusting Preachers?

[madog]

Are you being serious?  Are you saying science can't scientifically prove that birth, at our present evolutionary stage, can't produce the birth of a human child without sperm? or that a man dead for three days can't rise and come alive?

Science has more authority to talk about science than religion has to talk about science ... in fact the Bible doesn't try to talk about science it just relays myths, its the followers of the myths that think they can say more than the fiction book actually claims 

You misunderstood my entire point. Science cannot tell us whether a supernatural cause is possible or not.

Look science isn't in conflict with religion, it doesn't give a shit about fiction .....

If I write a fiction book stating that a ball will float and not fall to the ground if you coat it in butter, that is not in conflict with science as its FICTION .... It only comes into conflict with science when people claim it is non fiction and that the contention is fact ....

It is not for science to disprove every bit of fiction masquerading as non fiction, it is up to those making the claims to offer tangible evidence before science even acknowledges the claims