RE: Is There a Difference Between Trusting Scientists and Trusting Preachers?
July 18, 2016 at 5:01 pm
(July 18, 2016 at 4:30 pm)Rhythm Wrote:Quote:Like I said above, the theological concept might need to be re-evaluated. It can only be solved on a case-by-case basis.Waffles. There is no case by case basis...you have exempted those things you require...because you need them to be true. That;s not a case by case basis..that;s a two case basis. Things you don;t give a shit about, and things you do.
You are accusing me of things but won't give examples of where I am being inconsistent. What are "those" things that I require to be true that conflict with science? You point out that there are two categories of possible conflicts--I would not put it that way, but so what?
Quote:Quote:This is a good example. We can, but why would we use the word "supernatural" to rescue it? In my opinion, after examination of the pertinent theology it is not required that YEC is true.
Why..because -you- have......... It -is- required that YEC be true, you just belong to a different sect. They can;t use your metrics...and your method won't tell -you- that their core theology is wrong. To come to that conclusion...you did something else.
Why do I care what someone else believes? Their believe in no way affects what the truth is. I am trying to find my own methods of discerning the truth of complex issues.
