Evidence that God exists

[fr0d0]

Seriously Kyu.. I don't believe you said that. Really. Did you miss it? Did you miss my response? I replied to you on that thread at 1.09pm today. You posted this today at 5.02pm ...it's you that hasn't responded.

Um you posted, "Yesterday 12:14 PM", I posted my follow up, "Yesterday 11:41 AM" ... that clearly means I posted my response BEFORE you posted the link to your answer. I then posted saying I was awaiting an answer, "Yesterday 05:02 PM" and you say that that was AFTER your posted at 1:09PM today?

My answer to you on that thread is AFTER your last post. You posted at 12.45pm Yesterday, and I replied at 1.09pm Yesterday. You posted here that I hadn't responded at 5.02pm Yesterday ...nearly 4 hours AFTER I'd replied. You still haven't responded.

This may not be clear to you but I do tend to check the posts I make and for relevant follow-ups.

Well you missed this one. And this is the big one. The question you keep on saying that I avoid:

Now are you going to answer (properly) the points I have made (and I'll summarise)?

1. So it is valid to assume there is no god (in exactly the same way as we assume that the moon is not made of green cheese and that little green men in flying saucers are not constantly "buzzing " our Earth) until actual evidence is supplied yes?
   
2. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, you haven't provided any therefore it is safe to assume that what you claim has no (ZERO, NADA, ZIP) basis in truth and the claimant is either a fraud or deluded.
   

I await your response.

Well that's a large leap of logic you're making. I was leaving it alone as I think there's nothing to be gained from pursuing it.

Well actually I think there is the small matter of you apologising to me or withdrawing the assertion because I have demonstrated fairly clearly that I am NOT flame-baiting ... not, of course, that I expect you to do so (though my saying this may make you) but that would be pretty much par for the course for a theist.

I'd be proud of that trap. Nice one I can't win either way. So there's no point trying perhaps.

You seem to be demanding that I think what you want me to think.

I don't think that you have clearly demonstrated that you are not flame baiting, so at this time, my opinion remains that you are. When that changes, I'll let you know.