@benny:
You've made two different arguments in this thread. First, that gods are not sufficiently well defined so as to be able to categorically answer the belief question. Now you seem to be making an argument about the mechanics of belief and there being an indeterminate state in which neither belief nor disbelief predominates. Both seem to provide adequate foundation for a position of agnosticism on their own. So which one is the foundation of your agnosticism?
You've made two different arguments in this thread. First, that gods are not sufficiently well defined so as to be able to categorically answer the belief question. Now you seem to be making an argument about the mechanics of belief and there being an indeterminate state in which neither belief nor disbelief predominates. Both seem to provide adequate foundation for a position of agnosticism on their own. So which one is the foundation of your agnosticism?