(April 7, 2009 at 3:30 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:I believe it is. What thread are you referring to exactly? It doesn't seem to be the thread you linked and the subject of this disagreement.(April 6, 2009 at 6:05 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: My answer to you on that thread is AFTER your last post. You posted at 12.45pm Yesterday, and I replied at 1.09pm Yesterday. You posted here that I hadn't responded at 5.02pm Yesterday ...nearly 4 hours AFTER I'd replied. You still haven't responded.
Well someone is confused here and I don't believe it is me.
As you don't seem to know, here are the two key questions of yours you say I haven't answered on this forum: http://atheistforums.org/thread-904-post...l#pid13232 that I've responded to and await your reply. Still.
(April 7, 2009 at 3:30 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:As you don't seem to understand, what I meant was, If I apologise you already have that marked as dishonourable, and If I don't, then I'm bad as well. It's a bit like a Witch trial. Whatever I do I've lost, regardless of the truth.(April 5, 2009 at 3:49 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(April 6, 2009 at 4:59 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:I'd be proud of that trap. Nice one I can't win either way. So there's no point trying perhaps.fr0d0 Wrote:Well that's a large leap of logic you're making. I was leaving it alone as I think there's nothing to be gained from pursuing it.Well actually I think there is the small matter of you apologising to me or withdrawing the assertion because I have demonstrated fairly clearly that I am NOT flame-baiting ... not, of course, that I expect you to do so (though my saying this may make you) but that would be pretty much par for the course for a theist.
Win? What about just being plain honourable? Being willing to own up to a mistake YOU made? I would but as I expected it appears you are not capable ... says an awful lot about you and what it says is really not impressive.
(April 7, 2009 at 3:30 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:What can I say. I refuse to rise to your bait. You refuse to take my answer. Stalemate.(April 5, 2009 at 3:49 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You seem to be demanding that I think what you want me to think. I don't think that you have clearly demonstrated that you are not flame baiting, so at this time, my opinion remains that you are. When that changes, I'll let you know.
No... I am demanding you withdraw an assertion you made, which I have raised an excellent argument against and to which your ONLY defence is, "well I still think you are lah lah lah ... "
So it's disingenuous and dishonourable eh?
I'm impressed!
Kyu