Agnostics

[Excited Penguin]

This is a dick move. Only a person who knows is losing the argument would ever resort to such low tactics as to attack the practice of using perfectly good and established definitions of words. Only someone who is either uneducated, dishonest or both would do this

. . . said the black pot.

Dude, are you serious?  I keep telling you you're fine using your definitions, but I prefer to use other definitions.  I've said why I prefer those definitions, and why I choose to identify by one, while you prefer to label me by another.  You keep telling me what the words mean, as though they have only one definition, and trying to railroad me into following your preferred definitions.

Like I said, you're not even wrong in your etymology, and you have every right to think of me as an agnostic atheist if you want.  You do NOT, however, have a right to tell me what definitions of words I must use, and what I must therefore identify as.

Let's start over.

Can you please explain to me, how come I agree with you so much yet we disagree about a bunch of definitions?

Why do you not agree with soft atheism?

I'm sorry if I appeared condescending. I'll really make an effort now to have a conversation, no matter what it takes. Just fair warning for anyone else reading this, I'm disregarding what I know on the matter as of this point forward and will probably do some logic-bending efforts to attempt to reach some middle ground here, 'cause apparently being honest and sincere about what you know is being an asshole. But that's enough about that.