Agnostics

[Athene]

I'd have to say I agree with benny on this matter...yikes!..Yowsa!
I think it's quite possible that a person could be uncertain as to whether he or she actually believes or not.

No, it's quite simple, really.

---

For  1234 = God(s), the following is true:


A believes 1234 (more than A doubts 1234).
A is theist.

A1 doesn't completely believe 1234.
A1 is agnostic theist.

A2 completely believes 1234.
A2 is gnostic theist.


B doubts 1234 (more than B believes 1234).
B is atheist.

B1 doesn't completely doubt 1234.
B1 is agnostic(weak) atheist. 

B3 completely doubts 1234.
B2 is gnostic(strong) atheist.

B3 thinks 1234 is meaningless.
B3 is ignostic atheist.


A ≠ B.
A1 ≠ B1.
A ∩ B = ∅.

---

I don't need for you to explain any of this shit to me.  I understand the the difference between having a belief (or lack thereof) and claiming knowledge of such belief. I'm not arguing over the proper usage of said terms.

I'm only saying that I see it as being possible for someone to not actually know whether they believe in God or not.

Not referring to the claim of knowledge on the position, but to the position itself:

Do you BELIEVE a God exists? I don't know, I don't know if I believe, or I don't know what to believe, could very well be a person's honest answer. It may not fit the textbook definition of agnostic, but I can see why someone might extend the definition of agnostic to apply to the matter of certainty to their belief/lack of belief  as well. It's the term that would come closest to defining their position.