RE: Agnostics
August 3, 2016 at 1:31 pm
(This post was last modified: August 3, 2016 at 1:31 pm by FatAndFaithless.)
(August 3, 2016 at 1:29 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(August 3, 2016 at 1:12 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I think this discussion has come to the end of its usefulness, unfortunately.
Maybe. My intent was to demonstrate that a pure agnostic position is valid. I've made the most compelling arguments I'm capable of, and you guys are free to discard them if you like. But don't be surprised if, the next time you tell a declared agnostic that he's "really" an agnostic atheist, no matter what he says, you will face disagreement.
I've made it quite clear that I don't care to force labels onto people - that I care more about the concepts. I'm just finding this conversation more and more circular as time goes on. And if the 'pure agnostic' position is "I don't know what I believe," fine.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson