(August 5, 2016 at 9:43 am)abaris Wrote:(August 5, 2016 at 8:53 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote: That's what I don't get about anybody who's not a 1%er voting for a libertardian candidate, they are explicitly voting for a politician whose whole raison d'etre is to fuck them over because to use the terminology of Ayn Rand, they're "looters, if they weren't they'd be rich capitalists".
It's not as simple as that. There are certain aspects of the libertarian movement I can subscribe to. Such as civil liberties being untouchable and holy. There are others, I certainly don't subscribe to, such as leaving business to run totally unchecked.
I find that all too often with libertarians that their concept of "civil liberties" boils down to "if you're rich you can do what you want, if you're not well then sucks to be you".
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home