(August 14, 2016 at 6:49 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: I'd prefer there wasn't such a law to begin with, no matter what groups it might protect. That's limiting free speech. And that can only be acceptable in the most extreme of cases.
Horseshit. ALL freedoms are limited, of necessity. As a test, which of the following statements do you think should be protected speech?
1. All you fucking mud niggers should go back to Africa.
2. You have HIV? Serves you right, faggot.
3. So, Hafez - fucked your 12 year old daughter lately? If it was good enough for Mohammed, it should be good enough for you.
4. You know, gimpy - you might not be in that wheelchair if your mother hadn't fucked your brother.
I await your reply with something approaching boredom.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
