(August 14, 2016 at 5:29 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:(August 13, 2016 at 8:08 am)SteveII Wrote: Actually coming to earth and spending 33 years is one obvious answer to your question.
Yeah, just like the claim that Muhammad was visited by the Archangel Gabriel in the cave and received the Koran is evidence for the truth of Islam.
Sorry, but your claim that the stories in the Bible are evidence, is laughable. I'm sure this has been said to you many times, but the Bible is not evidence for your god, it IS the claim.
How do you continue to make the same fallacious arguments over and over?
Is it lack of intelligence or lack of intellectual honesty?
If you think Muhammad's personal revelation is the same as having real churches across the Roman empire, containing real people believing the events were real just a few years following Jesus death, then the 22 letters from 4 authors to those churches confirming their beliefs about Jesus, and finally 4 editors that obviously used eyewitness and source documents to write 5 thorough accounts of the events within the lifetime of the eyewitnesses, then you are approaching this analysis without any intellectual integrity.
Why isn't the life of Jesus and the NT evidence of God revealing himself? The "IS the claim" game is old and tired and is just nonsense. Of course historical events are written down and that's how we know today what happened 200, 2000, 4000 years ago. The first century thought they were accurate accounts of real events. Why don't you think they were accurate, or in your words, 'laughable' (forget your word games)?
