(August 16, 2016 at 11:43 am)Crossless1 Wrote:(August 16, 2016 at 11:41 am)SteveII Wrote: At any time, you can offer defeaters for a properly basic belief to show that it is not true. Go ahead, what is the defeater that shows that God does not exist? A 'properly basic belief' is both a belief that does not rely on inference and may be true. If it is not possible to be true, then it is not a properly basic belief.
So it's our job to show that your unfalsifiable claim is not true? That old game again?
Actually, no. That is not what the argument achieves. It simply removes the charge that belief in God is irrational, unjustifiable, or unwarranted. While it contributes to a cumulative argument for the existence of God, it does not prove it.