RE: The real religion?
August 16, 2016 at 1:15 pm
(This post was last modified: August 16, 2016 at 1:16 pm by Jesster.)
(August 16, 2016 at 11:30 am)SteveII Wrote:(August 16, 2016 at 10:17 am)bennyboy Wrote: And what year, exactly, are those letters dated? What's "just a few years" and how do you know, exactly?
You'd think if a dude was walking on freaking water, healing crowds of sick people, and doing water-to-wine party tricks, the Roman literature would be FULL FULL FULL of mention of him. Instead, he's pretty much completely absent except by those who formed his church decades after his supposed death.
Are you sure the document evidence is as solid as you think it is? Cuz I'm pretty sure it's not.
If you want to know the dates of 27 different documents, look them up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_the_Bible
So, your reason why my belief is 'laughable' is...what? There would have been more surviving Roman literature on what happened in Palestine during the life of Jesus? That is the criteria for laughable??? You're sure the evidence of the NT is not solid, yet...nothing of substance has been forthcoming.
No. You drew the line so you get to abide by it as well. No more links for arguments unless you want to go back and change your mind about mine.
I don't believe you. Get over it.